Washington, D.c. V. Greater Washington Board Of Trade
Legal decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that states cannot require employers to provide disabled employees the same health insurance with which they provide active employees. Regulation by states of employee benefit insurance plans is precluded when it relates in any way to employee benefit plans governed by the federal statute on pensions and benefits (EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1974 ERISA). The issue in this case was the relationship between WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE (as required by the states for job-related illness or injuries incurred by the employee) and federally regulated health insurance provided by the company for actively at work employees. The Greater Washington Board of Trade challenged the Washington, D.C. law that required employers who provide health insurance for actively at-work employees to continue to offer equivalent health insurance coverage to disabled employees who are eligible for workers compensation insurance.
Popular Insurance Terms
Legal case in which the United States Supreme Court held that pension assets are to be excluded from the bankruptcy estate of the plan participant. ...
Trust that is established by people still alive. ...
Employer using a self-administered insurance plan; or an insurer that administers a group employee benefit plan. In an employer administered plan, the employer maintains all required ...
Policy designed to act as a supplement to Medicare. The supplementation is in the form of additional benefits to that provided by Medicare. The additional benefits are in the form of ...
New rule entitled "Employers Accounting for Postemployment Benefits," which requires advanced recognition of nonretirement benefits, health insurance continuation, and severance pay. ...
Statistical projection of future illness, sickness, and disease. ...
Rule for accounting for contingencies that has application for the accounting of liabilities under the comprehensive environmental response, compensation, and liability act of 1980 ...
Insurance contract under which a policy owner cannot be assessed for adverse loss and expense experience of the insurance company. ...
Liability incurred by one insured as the result of his or her damaging another insured when both insureds are covered under the same liability insurance policy. Each insured must be treated ...
Have a question or comment?
We're here to help.