Puffing In Real Estate
The definition of puffing in real estate, also known as puffering, is an exaggeration of fact bordering on falsehood. You’ve probably heard a real estate agent make outrageous claims about their listing, lauding its outstanding qualities, only to find that the “outstanding” listing is not all that outstanding.
Puffing happens all the time in real estate, and under certain circumstances, it can be criminally punishable, so it’s best to be careful when making claims about your listing or its qualities. Let’s look at a couple of examples of puffing, and when it is and isn’t legal.
Examples of puffing in real estate
Puffing is very common in real estate, as previously stated. Real estate agents will do whatever it takes to sell a listing, and exaggerating a listing’s good qualities is not anywhere near the top of the list of crazy things real estate agents have done to sell a property. Ultimately, exaggerating your listing’s qualities is ok, as long as you don’t make any fraudulent claims about the listing you’re selling. Let’s look at a couple of examples that illustrate the difference between harmless exaggeration and fraudulent claims about a listing’s qualities.
For our first example of puffing in real estate, let’s take the case of a real estate agent named Janet. Janet has a listing that isn’t all that attractive on its own merits; it’s an aging bungalow from the 1980s in a low-income neighborhood, with a patchy lawn and peeling siding. Now, to make this listing seem more marketable, Janet exaggerates her listing’s good qualities.
She doesn’t mention the run-down appearance of the house, nor the poorly groomed lawn. She gushes about how “cozy” and “rustic” the house is when most would find it cramped and aging instead. This is a great example of puffing, and this type is generally perfectly legal. You’re not lying, after all; you’re just exaggerating.
A different, more insidious example of puffing in real estate is that of a realtor we will call Michael. Michael has a listing that wouldn’t be difficult to sell if it weren’t for one crucial detail: the owner wants an exorbitantly high price for the property. In order to sell the property, Michael takes a number of liberties with the facts about the listing.
He exaggerates the crime statistics of the area in which the listing is located so that it seems safer than it is. He lies about the state of repair the house is in, talking about how the plumbing is in excellent condition when in reality there are leaks and hard water sediment buildup. Depending on how severe these lies are, Michael could face fines or even jail time if they are discovered and proven. Ultimately, puffing is permissible only in as much as it does not entail fraud.
Popular Real Estate Terms
Supporting beam or connecting member between two walls. A cross tie gives support for wall structures. ...
The definition of restraint on alienation is a limitation on the right to convey or transfer owned real estate to another party. This restriction on conveying property has an effect that ...
The unadjusted basis of assets is the actual price paid for purchasing an asset without any reductions from depreciation deductions. In order words, the unadjusted basis is an asset’s ...
Compilation of all tax maps of a given tax district that are bound together and kept at the local tax office. The tax book is a public record that may be accessed by an individual for ...
The definition of low-income housing is any house that is either rented or owned by an individual or family that has a monthly household income that does not exceed a certain percentage of ...
Reduction of part of the balance of property by charging an expense or loss account. The reason for a write-down is that some economic event has occurred indicating that the asset's value ...
Act of postponing a closing for another day or place. Adjournments of closing can occur for a variety of reasons including the lack of an appropriate closing statement, one or more parties ...
Situation in which a purchaser acquires mortgaged property and continues to pay the mortgagee for the debt outstanding. Although the new buyer continues to pay the mortgagee for the debt ...
Opinion of a judge having no direct legal or binding effect on the outcome of a pending judicial decision. An obiter dictum is considered to be an incidental judicial remark about some ...

Have a question or comment?
We're here to help.